Calculate Pi to 2 Million Digits
|
Notebook |
Time to Calculate Pi to 2 Million Digits |
|
HP Compaq nx9420 (1.83GHz Core Duo) |
1m 19s |
|
HP dv6000z (1.8GHz Turion64 X2 TL-56) |
1m 54s |
|
Compaq V3000T(1.6GHz Core Duo) |
1m 26s |
|
Dell Inspiron e1505 (2.00 GHz Core 2 Duo) |
1m 02s |
|
Toshiba A100(2.0GHz Core Duo) |
1m 18s |
|
Acer Aspire 5102WLMi(1.6GHz Turion64 X2 TL-50 |
2m 22s |
|
Gateway E-100M(1.2GHz Core Solo ULV) |
2m 02s |
|
Dell Inspiron 600m (1.6 GHz Dothan Pentium M) |
2m 10s |
|
HP dv5000z(2.0GHz Sempron 3300+) |
2m 02s |
3DMark05对比测试成绩
| Notebook | 3DMark 05 Results |
|
HP Compaq nx9420 (1.83 GHz Core Duo, ATI X1600 256MB) |
3,704 3D Marks |
| Apple MacBook Pro (2.0GHz Core Duo, ATI X1600 128MB) | 2866 3D Marks |
| Alienware M7700 (AMD Athlon FX-60 Nvidia GeForce Go7800 GTX) | 7,078 3DMarks |
| ThinkPad T43 (1.86GHz, ATI X300 64MB graphics) | 727 3DMarks |
| Asus V6Va (2.13 GHz Pentium M, ATI Radeon Mobility x700 128 MB) | 2,530 3D Marks |
| Fujitsu n6410 (1.66 GHz Core Duo, ATI X1400 128MB) | 2,273 3DMarks |
| HP dv4000 (1.86GHz Pentium M, ATI X700 128MB) | 2,536 3D Marks |
| Acer TravelMate 8204WLMi (2.0GHz Core Duo, ATI X1600 256MB) | 4,157 3DMarks |
3DMark 06对比测试
| Notebook | 3DMark 06 Results |
|
HP Compaq nx9420 (1.83 GHz Core Duo, ATI X1600 256MB) |
1,662 3DMarks |
| Apple MacBook Pro (2.0GHz Core Duo, ATI X1600 128MB) | 1,528 3DMarks |
|
Dell Precison M90 (2.16GHz Core Duo, nVidia Quadro FX 1500M) |
3,926 3DMarks |
| Alienware M7700 (AMD Athlon FX-60 Nvidia GeForce Go7800GTX) | 4,085 3DMarks |
|
Compal HEL80 (2.0GHz Core Duo, nVidia Go 7600 256MB) |
1,654 3DMarks |
| Dell XPS M1710 (2.16 GHz Core Duo, nVidia 7900 GTX 512MB) | 4,744 3DMarks |
PCMark05对比测试成绩
| Notebook | PCMark05 Score |
|
HP Compaq nx9420 (1.83 GHz Core Duo, ATI X1600 256MB) |
3,888 PCMarks |
| Fujitsu N6410 (1.66GHz Core Duo) | 3,487 PCMarks |
| Alienware M7700 (AMD Athlon FX-60) | 5,597 PCMarks |
| Sony Vaio SZ-110B in Speed Mode (Using Nvidia GeForce Go 7400) | 3,637 PCMarks |
| Panasonic ToughBook T4 (Intel 1.20GHz LV) | 1,390 PCMarks |
| Asus V6J (1.86GHz Core Duo T2400) | 3,646 PCMarks |
| Sony VAIO FE590 (1.83GHz Core Duo) | 3,427 PCMarks |
如上表所示，通过3DMark2005和3DMark2006的测试可以看出，采用了256MB独立显示核心的Compaq nx9420的成绩已经超出了采用128MB独立显示核心的苹果MacBook Pro ，并且超出了采用nVidia Go 7600的Compal HEL80的成绩；但是，同一些采用专业级显卡的笔记本来说还有一段距离。
总结：对于目前市场上一些17英寸的笔记本来说，能够拥有一块高分屏幕、独立显示核心等等配置，这些已经变得越来越简单。但是，如何让这样的笔记本变成真正的“移动工作站”才是根本。惠普这款Compaq nx9420在保证了性能的前提下，把重量限制在3.3Kg，虽然还是有些重，但是比起其它17英寸机型来说，便携性已经提升了很多。
配置方面，除了双核CPU与显卡，惠普Compaq nx9420还最大支持4GB内存（双通道）。对于喜欢强性能、大屏幕的商用人士来说，Compaq nx9420是个不错的选择。
热点文章 网友评论